March 20, 2015

 "Although the court did not send updated NEFs, the district court promptly corrected the docket entries to state that the orders denied the underlying JMOL motions. The civil docket, therefore, had a complete description of those orders had AT&T bothered to check the docket, as it should have done." Click here to view the entire opinion.

Opinion decided 3/19/2015 on [14-1302], U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Washington).

Attorneys on both sides received email notices of court filings with certain labels. A few days later, the labels were updated, but no new notices were sent to attorneys.

For this exact reason we have invented CourtAlert^® ECF Assurance™. For less than $12 a month per case (for District, Circuit, and Multidistrict cases) you can ensure that this does not happen to you. We will alert you if a PACER docket is different from the ECF notices you've received. In addition, we will alert you if there are new PACER docket entries for which you did not receive any email at all.

Don't be fooled by an imitation. Only the CourtAlert^® product has passed years of rigid testing.

For more information visit our website, call 212-227-0391 or email Info@CourtAlert.com 

We are Committed to Remain the Best!

Yael Martin
CourtAlert